30JUN

Welcome To Mediterr J Med Med Sci

Manuscripts are accepted for consideration with the understanding that they represent original material and are not being considered for publication elsewhere. The editors welcome the submission of relevant articles for editorial consideration. Manuscripts and all scientific and professional data should be addressed to the Editor-in-Chief (fmosherif@yahoo.com, f.sherif@uot.edu.ly).

Mediterranean Journal of Medicine and Medical Sciences
https://mmj.org.ly/article/69fa4ed1a953955eef39e329

Mediterranean Journal of Medicine and Medical Sciences

Review Pharmacology and Toxicology

Adverse outcome pathways: A mechanistic framework for predictive toxicology and risk assessment

P. Veeresh Babu, Ch. Shrivalli, N. Sree Lakshmi

Downloads: 0
Views: 10

Abstract

The greatest health care and pharmaceutical problems remain adverse drug reactions and chemical toxicities. Because of the extensive use of animal testing, conventional toxicology approaches often do not have the mechanistic insights required to relate molecular perturbations to their adverse biological outcomes. To address this limitation, Adverse Outcome Pathway architecture is a sequence of causally related events beginning with a Molecular Initiating Event, followed by Key Events, and concluding with an Adverse outcome. This paper describes the construction and applications of AOPs in chemical risk assessment, predictive toxicology, and regulatory decision-making. More recent developments, including quantitative AOPs and AOP networks, have enhanced the ability to model biological complexity and dose-response interactions. AOPs provide a solid mechanistic basis of toxicity prediction and allow the transition of modern toxicology to non-animal, human-relevant testing systems, although barriers such as a lack of quantitative data and regulatory acceptability stand.

Keywords

Drug-induced toxicity, quantitative AOP, regulatory toxicology, systems biology

References

  1. Jiang H, Lin Y, Ren W, Fang Z, Liu Y, Tan X, et al. Adverse drug reactions and correlations with drug-drug interactions: A retrospective study of reports from 2011 to 2020. Frontiers in Pharmacology. 2022; 13: 923939. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.923939
  2. Pirmohamed M. Mechanisms of adverse drug reactions. In: Strom BL, Kimmel SE, Hennessy S, Ed. Textbook of Pharmacoepidemiology. Chichester (UK): John Wiley & Sons; 2nd ed, 2014; 459-474. doi: 10.1002/ 9781118820186ch30
  3. Rawlins MD, Thompson JW. Mechanisms of adverse drug reactions. In: Davies DM, editor. Textbook of Adverse Drug Reactions. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1st ed, 1977; 10-31. doi: 10.2165/00002018-200528100-00003
  4. Pirmohamed M, James S, Meakin S, Green C, Scott AK, Walley TJ, et al. Adverse drug reactions as cause of admission to hospital: Prospective analysis of 18820 patients. British Medical Journal. 2004; 329(7456): 15-19. doi: 10.1136/bmj.329.7456.15
  5. World Health Organization. Safety monitoring of medicinal products: Guidelines for setting up and running a pharmacovigilance centre. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2000.
  6. Uppsala Monitoring Centre. The importance of pharmacovigilance: Safety monitoring of medicinal products. Uppsala Monitoring Centre; 2002. Available from: https://who-umc.org/media/16469/the-importance-of-pharmacovigilance.pdf
  7. Tandon VR, Mahajan V, Khajuria V, Gillani Z. Under-reporting of adverse drug reactions: A challenge for pharmacovigilance in India. Indian Journal of Pharmacology. 2015; 47(1): 65-71. doi: 10.4103/0253-7613. 150344
  8. Sreeja R, Ramaiah B, Prabhudev BR, Bangi P. Adverse drug reactions: a prospective observational study at a tertiary care hospital. International Journal of Basic and Clinical Pharmacology. 2025; 15(1): 106-111. doi: 10.18203/2319-2003.ijbcp20254160
  9. Pirmohamed M, Breckenridge AM, Kitteringham NR, Park BK. Adverse drug reactions. British Medical Journal. 1998; 316(7140): 1295-1298. doi: 10.1136/bmj.316.7140.1295
  10. Ahmad GR, Ahmad D, Rajput SA, Khan H, Shammas MA. Reconsidering the scientific validity of the term “non-toxic” in toxicological risk assessment. Archives of Clinical Toxicology. 2026; 8(1): 8-10. doi: 10.46439/ toxicology.8.046
  11. Hayes AW, Kruger CL. Principles and methods of toxicology. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press; 6th Ed., 2014. doi: 10.1201/9781003390008
  12. Pognan F, Beilmann M, Boonen HCM, Czich A, Dear G, Hewitt P, et al. The evolving role of investigative toxicology in the pharmaceutical industry. Nature Reviews of Drug Discovery. 2023; 22(4): 317-335. doi: 10.1038/s41573-022-00633-x
  13. Jaeschke H, McGill MR, Ramachandran A. Oxidant stress, mitochondria, and cell death mechanisms in drug-induced liver injury: Lessons learned from acetaminophen hepatotoxicity. Drug Metabolism Reviews. 2012; 44(1): 88-106. doi: 10.3109/03602532.2011.602688
  14. Zanger UM, Schwab M. Cytochrome P450 enzymes in drug metabolism: Regulation of gene expression, enzyme activities, and impact of genetic variation. Pharmacology and therapeutics. 2013; 138(1): 103-141. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2012.12.007
  15. Cascorbi I. Drug interactions--principles, examples and clinical consequences. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2012; 109(33-34): 546-555; doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2012.0546.
  16. Pereira CV, Moreira AC, Pereira SP, Machado NG, Carvalho FS, Sardão VA, et al. Investigating drug-induced mitochondrial toxicity: a biosensor to increase drug safety? Current Drug Safety. 2009; 4(1): 34-54. doi: 10.2174/157488609787354440.
  17. Yaremi Quiros, Laura Vicente-Vicente, Ana I. Morales, José M. López-Novoa, Francisco J. López-Hernández, An integrative overview on the mechanisms underlying the renal tubular cytotoxicity of gentamicin. Toxicological Sciences. 2011; 119(2): 245-256. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfq267
  18. Khonsary SA. Goodman and Gilman’s the pharmacological basis of therapeutics. Surg Neurol International. 2023; 14: 91. doi: 10.25259/SNI_184_2023.
  19. Kudin AP, Mawasi H, Eisenkraft A, Elger CE, Bialer M, Kunz WS. Mitochondrial liver toxicity of valproic acid and its acid derivatives is related to inhibition of α-lipoamide dehydrogenase. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2017; 18: 1912. doi: 10.3390/ijms18091912
  20. Pichler WJ. Immune pathomechanism and classification of drug hypersensitivity. Allergy. 2019; 74(8): 1457-1471. doi: 10.1111/all.13765
  21. Pavlos R, Mallal S, Ostrov D, Pompeu Y, Phillips E. Fever, rash, and systemic symptoms: understanding the role of virus and HLA in severe cutaneous drug allergy. Journal of Allergy Clinical Immunology Practice. 2014; 2(1): 21-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip/2013.11.005
  22. Daniel L. Villeneuve, Doug Crump, Natàlia Garcia-Reyero, Markus Hecker, Thomas H. Hutchinson, Carlie A. LaLone, Brigitte Landesmann, Teresa Lettieri, Sharon Munn, Malgorzata Nepelska, Mary Ann Ottinger, Lucia Vergauwen, Maurice Whelan, Adverse Outcome Pathway (AOP) Development I: Strategies and Principles, Toxicological Sciences. 2014; 142 (2): 312-320. doi:10.1093/toxsci/kfu199
  23. Hoegberg LCG, Shepherd G, Wood DM, Johnson J, Hoffman RS, Caravati EM, et al. Systematic review on the use of activated charcoal for gastrointestinal decontamination following acute oral overdose. Clinical Toxicology (Phila). 2021; 59(12): 1196-1227. doi: 10.1080/15563650.2021.1961144
  24. Nelson LS, Howland MA, Lewin NA, Smith SW, Goldfrank LR, Hoffman RS. Goldfrank’s Toxicologic Emergencies. 11th ed. 2019; New York: McGraw-Hill.
  25. OECD. Users’ handbook supplement to the guidance document for developing and accessing adverse outcome pathways. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development; 2018. doi: 10.1787/ 5jlv1m9d1g32-en.
  26. Ankley GT, Bennett RS, Erickson RJ, Hoff DJ, Hornung MW, Johnson RD, et al. Adverse outcome pathways: A conceptual framework to support ecotoxicology research and risk assessment, Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. 2010; 29 (3): 730-741. doi:10.1002/etc.34
  27. OECD. The Adverse Outcome Pathway Knowledge Base (AOP-KB). Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development; 2020. https://aopkb.oecd.org
  28. Roper C, Tanguay RL. Adverse outcome pathways: Application to predictive toxicology. Toxicol Sciences. 2020; 173(2): 215-226. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-813602-7.00040-5
  29. Zhao H, Ni P, Zhao Q, Liang X, Ai D, Erhardt S, et al. Identifying the serious clinical outcomes of adverse reactions to drugs by a multi-task deep learning framework. Commun Biol. 2023; 6: 870. doi: 10.1038/s42003-023-05243-w.
  30. Jaeschke H, Ramachandran A, Chao X, et al. Emerging and established modes of cell death during acetaminophen-induced liver injury. Archives of Toxicology. 2019; 93: 3491-3502. doi: 10.1007/s00204-019-02597-1
  31. Vinken M, Knapen D, Vergauwen L, Hengstler JG, Angrish M, Whelan M. Adverse outcome pathways: A concise introduction for toxicologists. Archives of Toxicology. 2017; 91(11): 3697-3707 doi: 10.1007/s00204-017-2020-z.
  32. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Adverse Outcome Pathways. EPA; 2023. https://www.epa. gov/chemical-research/adverse-outcome-pathways
  33. European Food Safety Authority. adverse outcome pathways and their application in regulatory risk assessment. EFSA Journal. 2023; 21(6): 7744. https://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/efsajournal/pub/7744

Submitted date:
04/04/2026

Reviewed date:
05/01/2026

Accepted date:
05/05/2026

Publication date:
05/05/2026

69fa4ed1a953955eef39e329 mjmmr Articles
Links & Downloads

Mediterr J Med Med Sci

Share this page
Page Sections